SURPRISE: San Francisco is home to 59 newspapers, most of them local. Of the 59, seven are dailies. The Chronicle, Business Times, Daily Law Journal and the Recorder are delivered or sold in coin-operated sidewalk boxes. Also in the boxes are three “freesheets,” including the Examiner for readers who missed out on free home delivery.
The other Frisco papers, produced weekly or weakly, include 20 aimed at particular neighborhoods, 15 ethnic/minority, four religious, two gay, one lesbian, two ultra-left and two tabloid newsmagazines loaded with entertainment, opinion, investigatory stories and sex-related ads (SF Weekly and the Bay Guardian).
Most other big city papers, including the Chronicle and Mercury, are hurting because of shortfalls in circulation and their effect on advertising revenue. While average daily circulation declined by 3.5 percent in 2007 for 745 newspapers, the stats were worse for biggies. The New York Times was down by 3.8 percent (and the Sunday paper by 9,2 percent); the Los Angeles Times, 5 percent, the Washington Post, 3.5 percent.
“What’s alarming is that some analysts see the downward trend only accelerating,” wrote Lisa Snedeker in Media Life.
In Boston, where the Globe lost 8 percent of daily circulation in six months ending in March 2008, the Herald isn’t the only competitor for readers. The new freesheets include two dailies – Boston Now, Boston Metro – “and a slew of free alternative papers as well as dozens other dailies and community newspapers in the greater Boston market.”
><
WHAT'S behind this slow but unmistakable trend?
“Certainly the Internet,” Snedeker says, “but also increasing print competition led largely by free dailies.”
Free-Daily.com reports that in 1995 there were only five free dailies; as of last year, 67.
On the other hand, this year marks the apparent failure of a costly experiment in free home delivery of daily newspapers. It began with the San Francisco Examiner and spread to sister Examiners in Baltimore and Washington, D.C., all owned by a right-wing billionaire in Colorado named Phillip Anschutz.
About 160,000 free copies of the Examiner landed six days a week on doorsteps throughout the less sketchy neighborhoods in San Francisco. The phenomenon appeared to have escaped the notice of Chronicle poohbahs who sniffed derisively at the neo-Examiner's slender reporting staff of hard-working novices. We forget that the original William Randolph Hearst fed his father’s Comstock silver in 1877 into a dormant Frisco paper called the Examiner. He then built a newspaper empire intended in the early years to support his presidential ambitions by fair means or foul, mostly foul.
><
ANSCHUTZ was loping with the usual mob of runners in the Examiner-sponsored Bay to Breakers footrace in 2004. He must have decided that if you can’t beat them, buy the race.
Anschutz paid a reported $11 million for the newly dormant Examiner and brought in editors to revamp the Fang tabloid into a thin but surprisingly newsy mini-paper. He trademarked the Examiner’s Eagle nameplate in more than 60 cities, we were told. But the expansion by print is on hold. Anschutz didn’t get to be a multibillionaire by throwing his patrimony down the rathole. He chose in mid-July to end free home delivery four days a week (Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday and Friday), but those papers will still be stuffed into sidewalk boxes and converted into an online version. The Saturday paper would become a Sunday edition and home delivered, same as an expanded Thursday paper. Both would be bloated with inserts.
Jack Shafer had wondered about free home delivery of a daily newspaper.
“As Anschutz builds his 6-percent-margin newspapers, he must realize that a business model already exists that delivers news and advertising more efficiently,” the media commentator wrote in Slate.com. “Without looking like a shill for my bosses at the Washington Post Co. (which owns Slate), may I point to the washingtonpost.com and other online newspapers? No printing plants, no rolls of paper, and no delivery trucks – just a whole lot of computers and people. You don’t suppose that the newsprint Examiners are stalking horses for a nationwide network of Examiner Web sites, do you?”
><
SHAFER is a prophet. Look at monster.com. It ran an advertisement from examiner.com seeking “city editors” in 59 cities to “manage local content providers” (reporters?), presumably to begin online Examiners to support a set of political convictions somewhat to the right of Jerry Falwell.
A chain of e-newspapers would please Joel L. Levin, an attorney who lives in the upscale Federal Hill neighborhood of Baltimore. He asked the courts for a restraining order to stop unwanted deliveries of the Examiner.
The Chronicle chimed in last year with an op-ed by former city editor Alan Mutter. He wants a law to put an end to unsolicited menus, pamphlets, phone directories and, oh yes, free newspapers. His proposal has about as much chance as the Sacramento Bee’s crusade to empty Hetch Hetchy Reservoir. Nonetheless, the op-ed amounted to the Chronicle's only recognition – no matter how indirect – of the existence of the free throwaway paper.
><
LOOK on any downtown street corner in San Francisco and you'll see racks and boxes filled with the freesheets.
The Epoch Times, if the box hasn't been emptied by foes of the Falun Gong movement, is a nationally distributed news weekly with an office in San Francisco. It emphasizes news of world events and Asia.
In the newsracks of the Mission District, Frontlines is a vigorous apostle of far-left politics and criticism. The Militant does the same, but with an optimistic view shaped by the dedicated Trotskyist disciples of the Socialist Workers Party.
Soft feature stories of abysmal quality decorate the walls of advertisements in a throwaway with a fitting nameplate, Downtown.
“I still think people still want to read newspapers,” said Dave Price, co-publisher of the San Francisco Daily Post. (He changed the name from the Daily News this year after he launched the Palo Alto Post). He told KCBS reporter Mike Sugerman, “It's just that they want a different format. They want a format that gives them news about the community, tells them what they’re doing.”
Price, the editor, and Jim Pavelich, the advertising specialist, came from free papers in Colorado to found the upstart Palo Alto Daily News in 1995. It filled a community news vacuum left by the Chicago Tribune's ill-advised $28 million purchase in 1978 of the Palo Alto Times and its sister paper, the Redwood City Tribune, which were maladroitly combined into the Peninsula Times-Tribune. The plug was pulled in 1993.
To the locals, it was a disaster. To the newcomers from Colorado, it was opportunity. It wasn’t just that soccer dads wanted to find their daughters’ names in the paper. Ad rates were too high for the zoned editions of the Mercury and Chronicle. The freesheet experiment turned into a profitable chain of Daily News editions for San Mateo, Los Gatos, Redwood City, Burlingame and East Bay. (The Los Gatos paper is no longer a daily.)
In 2005, Price and Pavelich sold the
(Continued on Column 2)